>Его самого даже не судили ???? у вас с чтением как, порядок? "We therefore conclude that the government proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant currency was substantially connected to a narcotics offense." это что, не обвинение?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 23 Aug 2006 10:43 (UTC)???? у вас с чтением как, порядок?
"We therefore conclude that the government proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant currency was substantially connected to a narcotics offense."
это что, не обвинение?
http://www.thenewspaper.com/rlc/docs/2006/moneyseize.pdf
читайте, там написано.